Check Back Soon!

 
Puerto Rico Water Quality Victory

Court Orders EPA to Issue Regulations Defining Water Quality Anti-degradation Methods for Puerto Rico

Decision completes victory for Center’s clients in long-running legal action; EPA must act by May 2007

MAELC represents CORALations and the American Littoral Society in a 2002 lawsuit against EPA for the agency’s failure to issue Clean Water Act Water Quality Standards for Puerto Rico after EPA determined that Puerto Rico’s 1990 water quality standards revisions were not consistent with the Clean Water Act. Additionally, Plaintiffs alleged that EPA determined that Puerto Rico’s antidegradation methods fail to comply with the Clean Water Act thereby triggering EPA’s mandatory duty to step in and propose for promulgation antidegradation implementation procedures for Puerto Rico. Antidegradation is the requirement to maintain and protect existing uses of a waterbody and the level of water quality necessary to do so.

In August 2003, the Court ruled in Plaintiffs’ favor on two of the four issues in the case to protect human health and aquatic life from bacteria. The Court determined that EPA violated its mandatory duty by failing to determine whether Puerto Rico’s revisions were consistent with the CWA. Judge Jaime Pieras, Jr. ordered EPA to determine the revisions that are inconsistent with the CWA to promulgate new regulations. EPA complied with the Court’s Order to approve or disapprove water quality standards on October 8, 2003 and promulgated new standards by way of publication in the Federal Register on January 26, 2004. This mooted one of the remaining claims and in 2004 Plaintiffs filed for Summary Judgment on the remaining issue.

In February 2007, the Court ruled in Plaintiffs’ favor on the remaining issue, requiring EPA to set regulations for methodology and implementation procedures for its antidegradation policy. The ruling in this case is another confirmation that EPA is shirking its responsibilities under the Clean Water Act.  When presented with such EPA failures by citizens, the Courts are not allowing EPA to continue to ignore its mandatory duties. EPA is expected to comply in May 2007.  (CORALations v. EPA, Civil Action No. 02-1266 (D.P.R. 2002))


 

Center Takes Action Against Delaware's Largest Polluter

MAELC Comments, Calls for Public Hearing on Renewal of Indian River Power Plant Clean Air Act Permit
Center Wins Battle Over Improper Omissions From Florida's Impaired Waters List

Judge Agrees Hazleton Project Failed to Provide Adequate Groundwater Monitoring

Center Intervenes at DE Public Service Commission For Improved Conservation, Energy Efficiency, and Demand Response Programs

PA DEP's Dredge Plan for Hazleton City Landfill Challenged in 14-Day Hearings

Court Orders EPA to Issue Regulations Defining Water Quality Anti-degradation Methods for Puerto Rico

Center Argues Case Before Delaware Supreme Court

Center Appeals Decision Allowing Oil Lightering in Delaware Coastal Zone 

Exceptional Value Stream in Northeast PA May Face Renewed Threat from Surface Mining

MAELC Urges PA DEP to Require Stricter NPDES Permit Requirements for Wastewater Treatment Plants in Philadelphia

Center Seeks to Join Appeal to Support Ban on Horseshoe Crab Harvest

Clean Air New Source Review Update—Victory!

Brandon Shores Power Plant to Curb Visible Emissions

Center Defeats Blue Mountain Racetrack Plan

Delaware Waste Issues: Cherry Island Landfill and the Citizens Task Force on Solid Waste

Center Battles DNREC, DuPont over Dioxin-Contaminated Pile Along Delaware

Sunoco Refinery Update: Center Wins Additional Controls and Monitoring for Community in Settlement Agreement

Assawoman Canal Update: Center Seeks Restraining Order to Block Legislative Interference

Protecting the Coastal Zone from Liquefied Natural Gas In the Delaware River

Delaware Nature Society Challenges EPA's Clean Air Regulatory Rollbacks

New Source Review Reform Implementation

Center Gains Protected Status for Florida Scrub Jay

Center Protects Water Standards from “Backdoor” Weakening in 11th Circuit